2008/8/28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> this is sort of inheritance of data, right?
You could it call like that I suppose.
> the best i've made so far about this is to get (somehow) all the Rs
> each with it's groups, and then do the inheritance (union over the
> path towards root in your case) over the result rows by hand.
I was afraid for that.
> if u find a better way let me know...
Ofcourse, but I am afraid it is not likely. :-{
> traversing a (recursive) tree isn't an easy thing either, unless u
> save it as nonrecursive (keeping extra links etc) in a way or
> another.
I'll have to think about that. But properly this is only going to work
with tables that are not to big I am afraid.
Maybe I want to fancy things.
--
Cecil Westerhof
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
