On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:58 AM, KMCB wrote:
> > Michael, > > I had thought that may be the case, so I had already started with the > databases/mssql.py file. Do you think that is the best place to > start? Is SA structured that all DB specific components are stored in > that location? Just trying to scope the effort from my end, any > thoughts are appreciated. > > So far, I have noticed that for non DSN connections some minor changes > are required on the pyodbc calls. It was pretty frustrating but, I > found that I needed to use SDSN instead of DATABASE or DB (Filemaker > docs were worthless). > the Filemaker Pro dialect would probably be in its own file, in a similar manner to the "access.py" dialect. We've made efforts towards a new system whereby all the ODBC code for any kind of database backend would be centralized but this hasn't been completed as of yet. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
