On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Tomasz Nazar wrote:
> > Hmm, the circular dependency: I do have some mappers configured that > some cycle exists in fact. Is this what you're talking about? > > Conference-> (has many) ConferenceInterpreter ->(related to one) User > -> (created many) Conference -> ..... > I did so, cause it's worth for me to access: > /conference.participant.user/ and on the other side: > /user.conferences/ if you actually have foreign keys expressing multiple paths to the same things then there would be a cycle. It's hard to tell from your mappings, your tables don't seem to have cycles from a foreign key perspective. Even if there are cycles due to relation(), SQLA can handle all that as long as the cycles arent from a row to itself (and even that it can handle via the post_update option). I see a lot going on there, maybe inheritance and such ? (UserLang/Lang) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
