yeah man , this is why we're all moving to mongodb .... :)
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > Michael Bayer wrote: >> you have to rewrite your SQL to support the number of values in the IN >> clause for each parameter set. > > Hmm :'( > > While my code knows the number of values, they don't, and it may vary from > when they write the SQL to when that SQL gets executed by my code... > > Chris > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
