I can't reconcile your comment with mine...
...I want to limit the results returned to those matching a set of ids.
This isn't about storing schemaless content ;-)
Any serious ideas or should I just go sulk in the corner?
Chris
Michael Bayer wrote:
yeah man , this is why we're all moving to mongodb .... :)
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Michael Bayer wrote:
you have to rewrite your SQL to support the number of values in the IN clause
for each parameter set.
Hmm :'(
While my code knows the number of values, they don't, and it may vary from when
they write the SQL to when that SQL gets executed by my code...
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
