the caching query example doesn't work with 0.5, so there's nothing to compare with 0.5. The workings of the identity map have not changed.
On May 7, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Ergo wrote: > This is only happening when one uses QueryCache? > Im completly lost now because back in 0.5.x i never saw a single > problem of this kind. > > Every new request would use new correct data. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
