On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:34 AM, Faheem Mitha wrote: > My > usage is slightly non-standard - a foreign key pointing to a foreign > key.
that never worked, most likely. its very complicated to get the types to propagate up a chain like that, and all on a deferred execution, in a reasonable way. > > Ok. Well, it should be removed from the docs, I guess. it has. Its mentioned in one place with a huge caveat. Where are you reading this ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
