Cool -- works nicely, thanks again! On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com>wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:28 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > > > this could work really nicely with extend_existing, which has been > enhanced in 0.7.4, but there seem to be some glitches preventing it from > being super nice, so I can't get that to work right now. Just send in > those columns via your own means: > > Those glitches have a pending patch in ticket 2356: > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2356 See the modified example case > there. In 0.7.5 your use case will work exactly as you intend, where > you'll be able to add Column objects to your declared class that will take > precedence over what's autoloaded. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > > -- http://sabaini.at -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
