On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote: > > The hashing thing really has to start as a core concept first. It's a big > job but would be very helpful for caching scenarios and would allow us to > build this feature on Query without too much difficulty. The nice thing > about "unhashable" is that simple queries will be hashable, but as soon as > complexity increases you'd start seeing unhashables come in, preventing us > from caching something that isn't actually easy to cache.
AFAIK only py3 has support for making user classes unhashable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
