OK well I think "identity_key" is the more official name at this point, they are synonymous.
On Aug 31, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Torsten Landschoff <torsten.landsch...@dynamore.de> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi Michael, > > On 08/31/2013 12:34 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: > > well those are old functions and they should document that what you usually > > want is just > inspect(obj).key, if you have an object already. I added > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2816 for that. > > > > > > just to verify, state.key does what you want, right? > Correct. I was just wondering if the right name for it is key or > InstanceState.identity_key, the latter is documented. > > Thanks and greetings, > > Torsten > > - -- > DYNAmore Gesellschaft fuer Ingenieurdienstleistungen mbH > Torsten Landschoff > > Office Dresden > Tel: +49-(0)351-312002-10 > Fax: +49-(0)351-312002-29 > > mailto:torsten.landsch...@dynamore.de > http://www.dynamore.de > > DYNAmore Gesellschaft für FEM Ingenieurdienstleistungen mbH > Registration court: Stuttgart, HRB 733694 > Managing director: Prof. Dr. Karl Schweizerhof, Dipl.-Math. Ulrich Franz > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
