well there's always gevent. It might even be possible to get twisted and gevent to work together.
So far I've managed to stick with multiprocessing for any kind of parallelism and it's done fine, but I'm not scaling up to hundreds or thousands of simultaneous things going on. On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Iain Duncan <iainduncanli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, I just got a new position and am hoping I can advocate for using > SQLAlchemy there. I will be doing some backend web service stuff that > interacts with a db, but likely in some form of distributed architecture. > It's all going to be on AWS. I believe there will be some service > implementation that either needs to be highly performant or highly concurrent > or some combination of both. IE there may be lots of clients hitting the > service and the service has to interact with third party payment services > which might be slow, and we don't want the server choking just waiting on the > third party responses. > > Up till now I haven't had to do stuff in this domain. Can anyone tell me what > I might want to look into as far as ways of handling concurrency or > non-blocking services that will play fair with SQLAlchemy? I read that trying > to get SA working on Twisted is not a good plan. > > Would love any pointers on what to read up on, use, etc. Right now all my > experience is on Pylons/Pyramid and has not had to use any fancy messaging, > deferred processing, or concurreny handling so I think I have a lot reading > ahead of me. > > Thanks! > Iain > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
