if someone wants to pullreq the kw argument “full=True” on .outerjoin(), if it’s done effectively I won’t reject it.
On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Vanasco <jonat...@findmeon.com> wrote: > > > On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:46:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote: > well the alternative to full outer join is a union of two outer joins - more > tedious. “full outer join” isn’t in the library but you can just subclass > Join and do a @compiles to get that exact syntax. > > you could also query the union of two outer joins, by treating it as a nested > subquery. that is not only tedious, but painful and annoying. you could do > it though! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
