On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote:
> you either need to take order_by off the relationship(), probably the best > idea here if ordering isn’t important, or otherwise skip joinedload(), > write out the joins yourself and use contains_eager() ( > http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/loading_relationships.html?highlight=contains_eager#contains-eager > ). > Michael, Thanks for the ideas, we'll try them. Not sure I can remove the order_by relationship because we need the order other places... if I remove that, I will have to add sorting in each of the other places. But it might be worth it. I think the manual joins and contains_eager may be better for us. Will that work because the manual joins and contains_eager doesn't automatically trigger adding the ORDER BY clauses? cheers adam -- Adam Feuer a...@cookbrite.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
