On Monday 20 April 2015 19:22:36 Mike Bayer wrote:
>On 4/20/15 12:56 PM, Guido Winkelmann wrote:
>> I just tested, the problem is still present in the current master
>> (bd61e7a3287079cf742f4df698bfe3628c090522 from github). Guido W.
>
>can you please try current master at least as of
>a3af638e1a95d42075e25e874746, thanks.

I just updated to 3e80d628bd133d0fd0687e35b8d13abd1d31d6df (which comes after 
a3af638e1a95d42075e25e874746).

The problem has gone away with those changes.  Thanks for looking into this!

(We're still going to merge the patch where we drop the query entirely if the 
object we compare the relationship to is transient...)

        Guido W.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to