On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 4:07:07 PM UTC+1, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > There might be an old issue in bitbucket that the way associationproxy > insists on calling clear() without any hook to override, the AP has a > lot of old override hooks that are complicated and difficult to use, and > then don't even cover this case. So the AP is just not great in this > area and I'd prefer subclassing is not the idiomatic solution to this. >
I found this one – "try to add a real "replace collection" to association proxy" (https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/2642/) Regards, Piotr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
