does your test case show that? I guess I can run it.
I'm not around much for the next few days though.
On 04/05/2016 11:04 AM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 11:16:56 PM UTC-4, Mike Bayer wrote:
i think the problem is that if you aren't nesting the JOIN and instead
doing an implicit join, then things like joined eager loading don't
work
out as well. There's no subqueries in your primaryjoin I doubt there's
a difference in speed.
Well, I also haven't had the "a ha!" moment where I fully understand
this bit of sqlalchemy.
This has to do with the correlated subquery you suggested the other day.
This "sort of works", except it's not returning the right data set all
the time (if at all).
I think a large portion is that I haven't figured out how to properly
join multiple tables in `core`.
I can join 2 tables and do a `select_from`, but haven't managed to
figure out how to join more tables into that - everything I've tried has
returned the wrong object type
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
<mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
