Mike, Thanks for your reply!
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 1:15:32 PM UTC+2, Mike Bayer wrote: > > We've not started supporting new oracle 12c features as of yet, in this > case it might be possible to get it working with some dialect flags since > we already use "returning" to get at the newly generated primary key, > although testing would be needed and other assumptions in the dialect might > get in the way. Which flags do you have in mind? Looking at http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/dialects/oracle.html I don't see anything which might be useful to make it work. I was surprised Oracle needs different syntax with explicit sequence in SA. Having one syntax for auto increment column (primary key) across all backends seems like very important feature to have. What is the reason there's no Oracle dialect option to generate and use suitable sequence for such column? Is there some recipe solving this problem? Regards, Piotr Dobrogost -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
