In the case of the just-released dialect for CockroachDB, I called the package "cockroachdb". My plan (at least for now) is to include dialects for multiple ORMs in one python package instead of a separate package for each one.
I have a slight personal preference for "<db name>-sqlalchemy", but "sqlalchemy-<db name>" appears to be more common (e.g. nearly all of those listed on http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/dialects/index.html#external-dialects). On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 1:51:01 AM UTC-4, Shige Takeda wrote: > > Is there any package naming convention for SQLAlchemy dialect? I found > some are named: > > sqlalchemy-<db name> > > e.g., sqlalchemy-redshift, sqlalchemy-vertica,... > > while others are: > > <db name>-sqlalchemy > > I'm building one for our company's db, snowflake, and wondering which name > I should choose... > > Any advice would be appreciated. > > Regards, > -- Shige Takeda > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
