On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 1:50 AM Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> wrote:

> >>     Other software architectures can support parallelisation better,
> can't they?
> >
> > Can you clarify what you hope to achieve when you continue to make
> statements
> > of this form?  I don't find them to be very constructive.
>
> I dared to point out that I stumbled on another software limitation.
> Now I am also looking again for possible adjustments and extensions.
>


Why not report these problems to the cochinelle tool which you are trying
to integrate ?



>
> > There are many software architectures available for your use
>
> I check a few of them once more.
>
>
> > and you should choose the ones which work best for you.
>
> I hope to achieve more helpful evolution for affected software areas.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>

-- 
SQLAlchemy - 
The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper

http://www.sqlalchemy.org/

To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable 
Example.  See  http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to