On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 1:50 AM Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> wrote:
> >> Other software architectures can support parallelisation better, > can't they? > > > > Can you clarify what you hope to achieve when you continue to make > statements > > of this form? I don't find them to be very constructive. > > I dared to point out that I stumbled on another software limitation. > Now I am also looking again for possible adjustments and extensions. > Why not report these problems to the cochinelle tool which you are trying to integrate ? > > > There are many software architectures available for your use > > I check a few of them once more. > > > > and you should choose the ones which work best for you. > > I hope to achieve more helpful evolution for affected software areas. > > Regards, > Markus > -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.