On 8/22/20 10:46 AM, Vitaly Kruglikov wrote: > I suspect this has something to do with the combination of the > explicit definition of the `id_` column and reflection, but don't know > how to fix. I really need to keep the explicit `id_` descriptor and > shouldn't rename it to `id` because that's a reserved python word. > I would note that 'id' is NOT a reserved word (aka key-word) in Python, but the name of a built-in. As such id(xx) [which uses the built in] and obj.id [which can reference the id member of that object] are not incompatible. Don't use it as a variable name, as that would cause issues, but in an explicit scope like a class it works.
-- Richard Damon -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sqlalchemy/be9c0312-0fff-c543-1434-4550c00ed7a1%40Damon-Family.org.
