hi gaetan, On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Gaetan de Menten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:36 PM, alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> i'm so excited i was asking for functionality you were just at >> implementing today. > > I finally decided to implement it because of your message ;-). > thank you so much :) . i remembered to have raised this question a few months ago, but i was very embarassed to have forgot your answer that time. it's great you have implemented it' since sa already has it, and it reflects many life situations. >> an onetomany relationship would work on a set of records on the many >> side, which match >> certain field values on the record at the one side. until now, the one >> side always >> contained the pk fields, which changed now, and the now-source columns >> should be specified. > > *IF* I understand what you mean here, then the answer is: no, you > don't need to specify anything: that information is already included > in the primaryjoin, which is generated by Elixir. > so, you mean that the mere inverse will do the work, right?
> BTW: simple test of a O2M added to trunk now. i'm going to d/l the tests and run them right now. > -- > Gaëtan de Menten > http://openhex.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
