both tests pass like a charm. thank you so much :) .
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:48 PM, alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi gaetan, > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Gaetan de Menten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:36 PM, alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> i'm so excited i was asking for functionality you were just at >>> implementing today. >> >> I finally decided to implement it because of your message ;-). >> > thank you so much :) . i remembered to have raised this question a few months > ago, but i was very embarassed to have forgot your answer that time. > it's great you have implemented it' since sa already has it, and it reflects > many life situations. >>> an onetomany relationship would work on a set of records on the many >>> side, which match >>> certain field values on the record at the one side. until now, the one >>> side always >>> contained the pk fields, which changed now, and the now-source columns >>> should be specified. >> >> *IF* I understand what you mean here, then the answer is: no, you >> don't need to specify anything: that information is already included >> in the primaryjoin, which is generated by Elixir. >> > so, you mean that the mere inverse will do the work, right? > >> BTW: simple test of a O2M added to trunk now. > i'm going to d/l the tests and run them right now. >> -- >> Gaëtan de Menten >> http://openhex.org >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
