On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jens Alfke wrote:
SHA-1 is now definitely too weak, so it would be good for SQLite to offer an alternative that’s still safe(r).)
Are you somehow depending on sqlite3 for a SHA-1 implementation? That would be strange.
The SHA-1 implementation in SQLite is surely intended to ease certain aspects of SQLite development which are assisted from a portable implementation with no external dependencies.
The mere existence of an implementation does not mean that it is a defect.
Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
