On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Eric Grange <egra...@glscene.org> wrote:
> A bonus of having them defined in the core is that it avoids the minor > inconsistencies that are bound to arise in custom implementations (starting > with the name of math functions) > Yep. > Main downside is probably not going to be the size, but that it reserves > more names, and may conflict with existing custom implementations. From https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/create_function.html: add SQL functions or aggregates ***or to redefine*** the behavior of existing SQL functions or aggregates The "or to redefine" means existing host-app adding their own would trump the new built-in ones. --DD _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
