> perhaps the devs can invent some other namespace Seconded. I would like to think the devs, themselves, would like to create some sort of namespace or isolation for the structures created by the extensions. A little more gusto in the name, rather than STMT, would always be appreciated. imo
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > > On 14 Jul 2017, at 8:50am, Clemens Ladisch <clem...@ladisch.de> wrote: > > > There already is an "sqlite_" namespace, and it is reserved for internal > > objects of SQLite itself. > > > > The STMT virtual table is an extension that must be explicitly enabled. > > (The sqlite3 command-line shell does so by default, but it already did > > with other extensions like fileio, and it does not actually have the > > same API stability guarantees as the SQLite library.) > > Then perhaps the devs can invent some other namespace for this new > category of thing. I don’t mind what the name is, I would just like the > entity to be clearly marked as not one of mine. The ability to filter out > names including underline characters is very useful. > > Simon. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
