Richard, > On 8/3/17, Ulrich Telle <ulrich.te...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > The description of the new pointer-passing interface gives the impression > > that restricting the pointer type parameter to static strings or literals > > prevents misuse of the new feature. And that is definitely not the case. It > > might be a hurdle for unsophisticated developers, but not for the > > experienced ones. > > The documentation has now been adjusted to try to make it clear that > the static string requirement simply makes misuse of the interface > more difficult, not impossible.
Thanks. Certainly a valid point to not impose a runtime penalty on applications not using the pointer interface. As said I solved the issue for my SQLite wrapper. The solution only affects the calls to the pointer interface (like binding a pointer to a SQL parameter). Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
