On 5/14/18, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > Your benchmark doesn’t address the primary problems pointed out in the > Mozilla article:
The point of my article is that many people assume *without measuring* that reading and writing directly to the filesystem will be faster than using a database. That assumption is incorrect. The Mozilla article does not state this assumption explicitly, but it is there just beneath the surface. There are indeed many issue to consider when designing a storage system for an application. My point is to show that a relational database is often a much better choice than many people (including the authors of the Mozilla article) believe. Prejudices against relational databases that were acquired due to bad experiences in the previous millennium are still quite pervasive. I aim to combat those prejudices with actual measurements. Where there any actual measurements in the Mozilla article? It is quite old and I haven't read it in years, but I don't recall there being any. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users