Jay Sprenkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All of the arguments against my proposed changes are > > basically of the form that "this is not what the SQL standard > > says". They are theoretical arguments based on a world-view > > that holds that strong-typing is good and that it is the duty > > of database systems to enforce types. > > > > I do not hold to that world view. SQLite seeks a better way. > > I think it's a bit misleading to call the library "SQL-Lite: if you're > going to redesign > and not be like SQL. What do you think about creating a separate > project for a fast > light database engine that's not "SQL Like"?
SQLite is very much SQL. It only deviates from the standard to fix bugs in the original design of the standard. -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
