We look forward to your standards compliance branch, Jay.
Please tell us when we can expect to download your version.
--- Jay Sprenkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I proposed splitting the project into two branches so people who wanted
> standards compliance and the people who wanted ease of programming
> could both have what they wanted. The suggestion was called "lame"
> and "purist fetishism". Why does everyone insist on having only one
> tool in their toolbox and trying to use it for everything even when it's not
> suited for it? I don't suppose I should suggest an easy programming
> vs an efficient version either? They're fundamentally different goals
> and need different solutions.
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
