On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 05:18:45PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:

> For many years I have described SQLite as being "serverless", as a way
> to distinguish it from the more traditional client/server design of
> RDBMSes.  "Serverless" seemed like the natural term to use, as it
...
> So what do I call this, if I can no longer use the word "serverless"
> without confusing people?
> 
> "no-server"?
> "sans-server"?
> "stackless"?
> "non-client/server"?

I feel "non-client/server" gets to the core of it, but is slightly negative in
context - "well, here's what I'm not..".  Also a little unwieldy.


Regards,
Karl
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to