On 4 Feb 2020, at 6:27pm, Alex Bronstein <effulgents...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In such cases, you can easily end > up with more than 999 parameters. I'm curious. Can you show us some place where using 999 parameters is a reasonable way to use SQLite ? > PostgreSQL and some other databases support a 16 bit parameter count (64K > parameters). Given current memory availability, can sqlite's default be > raised to something similar to that? Might help to know that using the 64K'th parameter would cause SQLite to maintain a list 64K items long. It's an array, not a key/value lookup. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users