On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:03 PM Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> On 2/10/20, Digital Dog <digitald...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe they should be treated as a > > dictionary/hashtable/linked list or similar? > > > > > Parameter look-ups are on the critical path. How much performance are > you willing to give up in order to have parameters with larger > numbers? > > Thanks for enlighening again. It was just a thought. It seems it would be a lot of design and code to maintain the performance while preventing the original problem from happening. Not worth the trouble. But maybe increasing the parameter count to 10.000 would not hurt? > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
