Hi Nathaniel, even if it is not absolutely accurate, a factor of about 5 is beyond accuracy tolerances.
Kind regards Ulrich On Wednesday 22 February 2006 01:38, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:13:19AM +0200, Ulrich Schöbel wrote: > > I tried the 10 reps expecting even more. Then came the surprise: > > only 67 microsecs. > > > > My first feeling was, something like a busy disk or so came > > in just when I tried the 100 reps. But the results were reproducible, > > deviating only by a few microseconds. > > Perhaps your timing harness simply can't get accurate results at a > mere 10 repetitions? > > -- Nathaniel
