Clay Dowling wrote: > Sarah wrote: > >>Hi,all >> >>First of all, I want to thank all the guys on this mailing list for their >>warm help. >> >>After 1 more month of work, I finally make SQLite work on my embedded >>environment. SQLite is really great! Many thanks,Drh. >> >>But, due to the extremely heavy hardware constraints, I have to give up >>SQLite finally. >> >>So I'm trying to find a much simpler data access and retrieval engine. >> >>Could anyone give me some help on this issue?(some guidance on how to make a >>DARE or is there any open-source one available?) >> >>thanks in advance. > > > The Berkeley DB engine and it's related engines might be suitable for > your situation. They don't give relational access, but they do give > fast key=>value retreival and that might be suitable. The SleepyCat DB > engine from SleepyCat Software is probably the best, but for a > commercial application the licensing fees mean that you have to be well > funded and expect a good return on the product. > > Clay Dowling Berkely DB is still quite bloated. What do you require for data access? For an embedded system you might find something which matches your needs very well and has a tiny footprint.
I can give you some B* Tree code which is suitable for a high performance simple and lightweight embedded application or some AVL tree code which would suit a simpler smaller scale memory resident embedded data access application. You would have to adapt it to your application, but could expect to get your database access in 20K or less of executable image. Of course you have no SQL. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
