People (myself being one of them) were asking if it could be put back the way it was. Several of us (those that replied at least) stated our dislike of the new single .c file format. It was also a question (hence the subject line). No one ever replied. It seemed like something worthy of at least a reply.
- Patrick Bennett -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:46 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] May I ask why the source distribution mechanism was changed starting with 3.3.14? Martin Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As fas as I know, the dev team is Dr Hipp and Dan Kennedy (apologies if > there's someone else and I missed you) and I agree, it is slightly odd > for neither of them to reply. > Why is it odd? The issue is not something that needs replying to. This is not a bug. There has been a request for a different kind of partially-compiled code distribution for the convenience of some users. We have observed the request. What more needs to be said? -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------