"Andrew Finkenstadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see a reference to SQLITE_BUSY_RESERVED_LOCK in version 3.3.15 (the first > one with the amalgamation), but there does not appear to be support for it > in the remainder of the source file. > > Is that correct?
So it appears.... -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
