DISQLite3 does not use SQLite.NET. As I read Sam, he did not say so. He just compared the two to support his argument that "loadable extensions are not required to create custom functions and having access to source is not required for custom functions either".
Ralf >I was not aware that DISQLite3 uses SQLite.NET. > >--- "Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> loadable extensions are not required to create custom functions, and having >> access to source is not required for custom functions either. SQLite.NET >> provides very clean support for custom functions written in any .NET >> language and they are loaded automatically by the wrapper from any DLL >> present in the application--they don't have to be added to the SQLite.NET >> codebase. >> >> Sam ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
