As shown another thread, Richard has his facts wrong. See http://www.nabble.com/Improving-performance-of-SQLite.-Anyone-heard-of-DeviceSQL--to14280006.html#a14317195
Steve A. Pagaltzis wrote: > > * John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 17:55]: >> In general claims of "20x" or even "5x" imply either serious >> deficiencies in the compared product or a generous dose of >> snake oil in the challenger. > > Depends. The outline given by Dr. Hipp about the product’s > features may the claim quite plausible, because you pay a hefty > cut in features and reliability in exchange for a very large > increase in speed; a price that many may well find unacceptable. > (It is, after all, easy, as they say, to compute the wrong answer > in constant time.) > > Regards, > -- > Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DeviceSQL-tp14297970p14327322.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
