On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:25:01AM -0500, Rob Sciuk wrote:
> You know, I believe that an "embedded" SQL has a philosophy which is
> inherently minimalist.
...yes, I know.
> Your request specifically goes against the
> philosophy of what SQLite was designed to be. DRH is working hard to
> protect an ideal which has appealed to millions, and continues to do so,
Of course, I appreciate work of dr. Hipp
> and adding bloat will not contribute to its future success.
Of course, any feature, which *you* aren't especially fond of, you can
describe as "bloat". Even the most useful feature (which is useful FOR ME)
- can be "bloat" for you. And vice versa. No, I'm not using *all*available*
features of SQLite. Are they "bloat"? Answer yourself.
I'm not quite sure, what is the point in continuing this thread, when
*yesterday* already I responded to the denial sent by Darren Duncan, that
it's OK, and I can understand, that the devs didn't share my point of view.
If it's going to convince me, that I don't need what I need - it's
pointless, because I know my own needs much better. Otherwise I've got no
idea, where should it going to, when I already wrote "OK, no problem".
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
