On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:25:01AM -0500, Rob Sciuk wrote: > You know, I believe that an "embedded" SQL has a philosophy which is > inherently minimalist.
...yes, I know. > Your request specifically goes against the > philosophy of what SQLite was designed to be. DRH is working hard to > protect an ideal which has appealed to millions, and continues to do so, Of course, I appreciate work of dr. Hipp > and adding bloat will not contribute to its future success. Of course, any feature, which *you* aren't especially fond of, you can describe as "bloat". Even the most useful feature (which is useful FOR ME) - can be "bloat" for you. And vice versa. No, I'm not using *all*available* features of SQLite. Are they "bloat"? Answer yourself. I'm not quite sure, what is the point in continuing this thread, when *yesterday* already I responded to the denial sent by Darren Duncan, that it's OK, and I can understand, that the devs didn't share my point of view. If it's going to convince me, that I don't need what I need - it's pointless, because I know my own needs much better. Otherwise I've got no idea, where should it going to, when I already wrote "OK, no problem". -- pozdrawiam / regards Zbigniew Baniewski ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------