Geoff Lane wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:41:50PM +0000, Toby Roworth wrote: > >> I'm not trying to be picky here, or start telling you that you're wrong, >> but it could be worth changing - if an oracle developer (etc) were to >> look at the page, the could potentially have a field day when they can >> point out something like: >> > > It is just a list of estimates. > Indeed, it does state that clearly. I just feel it could potentially damage the image of SQlite to have a fact stated on the front page that, when looked into, is based on what could be considered flawed logic, as it seems an unfair comparison. I've seen people get very aggressive on these matters (Adobe on the Prism page on mozilla labs, for example). > The list does omit about 10 million Solaris 10 installations. Solaris 10 > uses sqlite to manage parts of the package and patch installation process. > > I use sqlite in shell scripts (I guess many others also do so) and so sqlite > will rapidly get installed on any new computer I look after, if it is not > already there. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > >
_______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
