<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > My real question is if there is an efficient way to index the results > of such a query. In other words, I'm looking for rows N through N+100 > of the result. Can I do much better than just executing the query and > throwing away the first N rows?
In general, no. You can use LIMIT and OFFSET clauses, but all that does is instruct SQLite to throw away the first N rows so you don't have to do it manually. More often than not, what you really want is not "get 100 rows at position N", but "get 100 rows following the rows I've retrieved last time". This can in fact be implemented more efficiently: see http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=ScrollingCursor Igor Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
