Jeff Picciotti wrote:
> I know it would be simple to separate the column out and create a 
> :memory db, but that would require numerous changes to our system 
> (easily doable, just not at the moment)  So I was just checking the 
> community to see if anyone has any ideas or thoughts on this!
> 

Jeff,

You might be able to do this easier if you use a temporary table to hold 
the transient data. The temp table could be joined with a permanent 
table in a view that would replace the existing table. All your existing 
queries would work the same as before (I think, there may be issues with 
column naming, but that can be fixed by setting aliases for all the 
result columns in the view that match the existing table's column 
names). You would then have to add a set of "instead of" triggers to 
handle inserts, updates, and deletes from the view.

HTH
Dennis Cote
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to