You have a good point there, I've been using that wrongly. I'll try that. Thanks
Kees Nuyt wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:48:00 +0000, Kim Boulton > <k...@jesk.co.uk> wrote in k...@jesk.co.uk, General Discussion > of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>: > > >> *Then queried the Sqlite3 table with:* >> PRAGMA cache_size = 20000000; */uses up 1.5GB RAM regardless*/ >> > > cache_size is expressed in number of pages. > default_cache_size is useful too. > > >> PRAGMA page_size = 20000000; /*this doesn't make any difference*/ >> > > PRAGMA page_size will only make a difference if you use it > when creating the database (before the first table is > created), or just before a VACUUM statement. > Don't make it too big. 4096 or 8192 are a good start to > experiment with. > > >> Unless anyone has some good ideas I might >> have to give up on Sqlite. >> > > I'm sure you can get more performance if you tweak page_size > and cache_size with some more understanding. > Use whatever engine is best for the task. > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
