Each thread has it's own connection handle (stated this in the original email).
anyone want to see a stack trace? On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Lawrence Gold <lawrence.g...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Apr 8, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Dave Brown wrote: > > > Thread A is in the process of executing sqlite3_step(). I can post the > > full stack if you want. It goes all the way down to winSleep() in the > > sqlite3 codebase. After the full busy timeout, thread B (not A) gets > > SQLITE_BUSY returned. > > Does each thread have its own connection handle or are they sharing > one? That might make a difference. > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users