Could we not disparage different OSs and languages? A fair comparison of performance isn't between a C and C# implementation of SQLite, but between a C# and Java implementation of SQLite. Both C# and Java are managed languages that run atop a VM that runs atop an OS. C is down on the metal. I would expect the C version to be faster.
I don't know the background of why this programmer did a port directly to C# instead of binding C# to the existing C library, but I assume he had his reasons. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Williams" <f.willi...@verizon.net> To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database" <sqlite-users@sqlite.org> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 6:08 AM Subject: Re: [sqlite] ANN: SQLite 3.6.16.C# > > Hummm... Guess there is a reason there are no implementations of C# > external > to the Mickeysoft world :-) > > Guess if I had a lot of time to kill I could port it to Delphi... > > BTW, what's the memory footprint? > > Fred > > -----Original Message----- > From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org > [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]on Behalf Of Kosenko Max > Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 6:22 AM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: [sqlite] ANN: SQLite 3.6.16.C# > > > > Seems like I've misunderstood your performance results. And they are > 3-5times > slower than original... > > ----- > Best Regards. > Max Kosenko. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/ANN%3A--SQLite-3.6.16.C--tp24764742p24768252.html > Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
