D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>> Thank you.
>>
>> I understand you can't fix these warnings since you don't have  
>> access to
>> such machines. Would you like access? If so, I can give you access  
>> to a
>> 16-core Sun T5240 at the university of Washington, with runs Solaris  
>> 10
>> update 7 (latest version). It also has the Sun compiler installed (not
>> quite the latest I must admit), though I could easily change that.
>>
> 
> 
> We probably don't need your compiler to "fix" the warnings.  Either  
> the warnings actually point to bugs, or they do not.  If they do, we  
> will fix the bug.  If the do not (the likely case, based on historical  
> trends) then we will do nothing because warnings are not errors but  
> misguided efforts to "fix" warnings often introduce errors.



> But as it stands now, we cannot even evaluate the warnings to  
> determine whether or not they are bugs because you haven't told us  
> what version of SQLite you are attempting to compile so the line  
> numbers are meaningless.  (In a 100,000-line source file, line numbers  
> shift drastically from day to day.)  

sqlite 3.6.17 is being used.

The only configure option used is --prefix.

> We want to know the value of the  
> following two C preprocessor macros:
> 
>      SQLITE_VERSION
>      SQLITE_SOURCE_ID

Tell me how to get them, and I'll tell you what they are.


_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to