Hey folks, Thanks for the quick responses. Should have had gmane sort an "rtree" query by date instead of relevance ...
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:10 PM, George Hartzell <hartz...@alerce.com> wrote: > Wow, there must be an outbreak of SQLite-genome-itis going around. Apparently so! Perhaps it'll pop up on google's *trends soon (a lá http://www.google.org/flutrends/). > I've successfully built an SQLite DB of UCSC's snp130 data using an > rtree_i32 virtual table. > > Try creating the rtree with something like this (from memory): > > create virtual table my_index using rtree_i32 ( > id, > etc.... > ); Seems to work perfectly, thanks.. > I'd still like to know if rtree_i32 is considered "supported" or > likely to disappear, or.... If it's going to stay around it'd be nice > to mention it on the rtree page. If there's some problem lurking > behind the corner it'd be nice to know that too. Agreed. Thanks once again, -steve -- Steve Lianoglou Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | Weill Medical College of Cornell University Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
