On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:51 AM, CityDev <nab...@recitel.net> wrote: > I'm interested in your remark that relational databases now cope with > 'arrays'. Personally I've never seen that in DB2, Jet or SQLite. That just > seems so contrary to the original idea of the relational model that you > shouldn't have any data whose meaning is not defined by data (in the case of > an array you need to understand the significance of relative position - > remember relations have no row or column order to stop you playing that > game).
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/arrays.html -- Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
