I'm confused according to Dan Kennedy : "Each shared-cache has its own mutex. The mutex is held for the duration of each sqlite3_step() call. So the way you're defining it here, you can't have "real" concurrency when using shared-cache mode in any case. "
So, it's a little bit "antagonist" to say "with shared cache they will be parallelized pretty effectively in the same file too" -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Asynchronous-I-O-and-shared-cache-tp26402983p26407922.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
