> Pavel: Yes, I allocate memory inside the ping function, but that is done
> after calling de sqlite functions. There are no pointers shared between the
> sqlite functions and the ping part.
Actually I meant pointers shared between ping part and the part before
calls to sqlite functions.
Did you try running under valgrind?
Pavel
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Martin Sigwald <msigw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I already tried that, and the first ping works while the second one doesn't,
> which validates my "screwing ports theory".
>
> Simon: Tried changing the DB_NAME and it didnt work either.
>
> Pavlov: Yes, I allocate memory inside the ping function, but that is done
> after calling de sqlite functions. There are no pointers shared between the
> sqlite functions and the ping part.
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Teg <t...@djii.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> Do the ping both before and after you open the DB.
>>
>> ping_server("10.0.0.4"); //my ping function, which pings a "hardcoded" IP,
>> sqlite3_open(DB_NAME);
>> sqlite3_close(DB_NAME);
>> ping_server("10.0.0.4"); //my ping function, which pings a "hardcoded" IP,
>>
>> See if the first one works. That'll validate your theory. My guess is
>> the first one won't work either and you're barking up the wrong tree.
>>
>> C
>>
>> Tuesday, March 23, 2010, 12:55:36 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> MS> I have a program which builds an ICMP package over IP and sends it.
>> Before
>> MS> that, I get IP number and other information from a SQlite DB. I was
>> having
>> MS> problems, so I began to comment different parts of the code, until I
>> got to
>> MS> this code (pseudocode):
>>
>> MS> sqlite3_open(DB_NAME);
>> MS> sqlite3_close(DB_NAME);
>>
>> MS> ping_server("10.0.0.4"); //my ping function, which pings a "hardcoded"
>> IP,
>> MS> doesnt interact with DB
>>
>>
>> MS> If I run that code, the package nevers gets send (can't detect it with
>> MS> Wireshark). If a comment the sqlite part, it works perfectly. Somehow,
>> the
>> MS> SQlite function calls are screwing with the port access, but I can't
>> fin any
>> MS> reasonable explanation.
>> MS> Any ideas?
>> MS> I've been stuck for days with this problem.
>>
>> MS> Regards,
>> MS> Martin Sigwald
>> MS> _______________________________________________
>> MS> sqlite-users mailing list
>> MS> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> MS> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Teg mailto:t...@djii.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
